BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(8)

Penyataan masalah/ Masalah kajian (Bab 1)#JomTulisTesis (7:38)

 

                   Jadi bab 1 kita teruskan 1.3 pernyataan masalah Okey penyataan masalah ataupun masalah Okey dalam penyataan masalah Biasanya pelajar menpunyai Masalahnya minta nama penyataan masalah masalah macam mana nak tulis penyataan masalah ini sangat kritikal dan sangat penting kadang-kadang pelajar dia letak sampai 10 halaman masalah nak huraikan tentang penyataan masalah bila kita baca langsung tidak ada masalah jadi berhati-hati dan juga Pelajar selalu letak penyataan masalah tu dia letak yang dia rasa macam saya dapati bahawa pelajar tidak pandai mengira 1 hingga 10 awak tu Siapa jadi kita tak boleh kita kena ada rujukan nak tak Masalahnya bukan merupakan perkara yang penting perkara yang penting maknanya kita perlu rujuk perlu rujuk Siapa yang punya kajian yang ber yang menunjukkan bahawa tiada masalah dalam kajian tersebut ataupun kenyataan daripada orang ini yang daripada normaliza Abdul Rahim 2019 mendapati bahawa pelajar kurang berminat untuk untuk mendengar ataupun untuk mendengar cerita berbentuk sekian sekian sekian ada jadi itu dan menunjukkan untuk menunjukkan adanya kelainan daripada kajian ini juga mendapati bahawa lima pelajar didapati didapati tidak boleh gunakan kata kerja dalam kata dalam penulisan karangan contoh Dia ada itu dah nampak masalah-masalah Itu Milik Kita dapati kita Huraikan sikit Kemudian masalah meminta diri untuk tadi ada sokong oleh Kajian yang dijalankan oleh Nur Maisarah Rosalan 2019 ini mendapati bahawa pelajar tidak dapat mengenal pasti akan the kerja dalam dalam membina membina soalan contoh dia contohnya ada di adalah sokong 2 kajian ini sokong  timbulnya masalah tersebut Okey Barulah betul jadi itu yang menunjukkan masalah huraian kita tu jadikan sekarang pelajar biasa dia pergi buat  macam mana dia pergi buat Okey contohnya kajian itu tentang kata kerja yang awak punya kajian tentang kata adjektif contohnya  jadi awak boleh buat kajian oleh Normaliza abd rahim tidak berfokus kepada kajian tentang kata adjektif itu dikatakan penyataan masalah salah tu Tidak boleh Tidak boleh Tidak boleh macam seolah-olah Memanglah dia buat kata kerja sebab dia fokus kepada kata kerja tetapi awak tidak boleh kata tidak bertugas kepada kajian tentang kata adjektif itu dikatakan datang salah-salah tu Tidak boleh Tidak boleh Tidak boleh macam seolah-olah Memanglah dia buat kata-kata kerja sebab kita kerja sebab dia berpegang kepada kata-kata Sahaja tetapi awak tak boleh kata dia tak buat pasal kata aktif Memanglah dia tak buat kata aktif  tu sebab dia fokus kepada kata kerja itu salah itu yang jadi penghuraian di sini ni seperti  saya katakan tadi perlu ada ayat yang dinyatakan oleh pengkaji tersebut dalam artikel dia  jadi penyataan masalah ini dan terbahagi  kepada  objektif Contoh objektif ada dua Ada dua perenggan di sini Kalau objektif ada tiga ada tiga perenggan satu dua tiga dia tiba-tiba Mana ada tiga perenggan satu dua tiga orang yang dalam ini orang yang daripada kajian dan disokong oleh siapa okey ayat seperti saya katakan tadi ya macam dekat berkata dia kemudian hujung hayat tu justeru disuruh kajian ini justeru kajian ini ingin mengebalpasti mengenalpasti wacana teks skrip animasi bla bla bla sbb didapati dekat sini bahawa kajian itu mendapati bahawa pelajar contohnya pelajar atau skrip animasi tidak melambangkan apa dia apa dia jadi itu kajian menurut orang tu cakap bukan kita cakap orang itu yang cakap jadi serupa juga dengan yang ini kena ada sokong kajian ini didapati mempunyai panyataan masalah dalam tu maknanya pelajar tidak boleh mengenal pasti kata adjektif contohnya justeru kajian ini ingin menganalisis kata adjektif yang terdapat dalam penulisan karangan kanak-kanak macam contoh penyataan masalah ketiga okey menurut nurwidad roslan 2019 pelajar didadapti tidak didapati tidak berminat dan tidak boleh mengira tidak berminat atau tidak dan tidak ber tidak boleh mengira nombor nombor 1 sehingga 20 jadi kita kena kaitkan hujung hayat perenggan itu Kaitkan dengan aktiviti hujung hayat ni kat dalam bilik ke di hujung hayat ni saya dengan dia tiba-tiba jadi Barulah ada penyataan masalah ini berkaitan dengan awak punya objektif jadi rujukan dalam rujukan yang dalam ini dalam permasalah kajian ini perlulah lima tahun ke belakang kita tak bolehlah kita ambil apa nama pejabat matahari pada Kajian yang lama-lama kita kena faham bahawa kajian ini jalan Sekarang ini semuanya dah Berbeza berbeza dengan kita mempunyai teknik kita dah dunia digital jadi budak-budak pun pandai macam saya katakan sebelum ini zaman dulu bolehlah kata Eh budak ni pandai betul tu dik betul kita tanya satu soalan dia jawab 10 jawapan anda tetapi dalam dunia didik kita sekarang ini berbeza yang mana sekarang budak-budak kita tanya satu soalan dia dijauhkan sampai 47 sampai kita kata OT berhenti jangan bagi jawapan dah letih cikgu nak dengar jadi Ada budak-budak tu sampai sekarang dia ni dia dah lebih ada lebih ke hadapan sebab kita dah ad a dunia dia tu kita ni masing-masing ada dah telefon mudah alih telefon bimbit masing-masing dalam beg kadang-kadang telefon dia lebih mahal daripada tepung kita putuslah kita ya ada di pastikan penyataan masalah ini betul tak perlu Panjang lebar Kerana apa yang terdapat rujukan dalam ini dalam ini dan dalam ini semuanya ada huraian yang lebih Panjang lebar dalam bab dua jadi penyataan masalah ini nama-nama ni mesti adalah dalam bab2 Tak bolehlah awak ada nama nama dia bertemu dia pembentukan tak ada pergi nama yang awak dah kata dalam Datang masalah tak ada dalam bab2 tak boleh ini secara ringkas yang dikatakan tentang penyataan masalah ini ini kita secara terperinci tentang kajian seluruh dunia tentang orang ini normaliza 2009 akan jadi anak secara menyeluruh ini dengan Panjang lebar jadi maknanya kena adalah tak ada yang ini nama awak sorok di sini Ambil di sini tu kat sini mesti ada dalam hati kan betul dia penyataan masalah ini amat penting jadi Biasanya pelajar dia nak dapati bahawa agak sukar untuk penulis kenyataan masalah ini sekarang bila dah belajar ni sudah tidak ada masalah

 

 

Statement of problems / Research problems (Chapter 1)#JomTulisTesis (7:38)

 

                   So chapter 1 we continue 1.3 problem statement Okay problem statement or problem Okay in problem statement Usually students have Problems ask name problem statement how to write this problem statement is very critical and very important sometimes students he put up to 10 pages of problems want to describe  about the problem statement when we read there is no problem so be careful and also Students always put the problem statement he put that he feels like I find that students are not good at counting 1 to 10 you Who so we cannot we have to have a reference want  The problem is not an important thing important thing means we need to refer need to refer Who has a study that shows that there is no problem in the study or a statement from this person who from Normaliza Abdul Rahim 2019 found that students are less interested to listen or  to hear cherries  ta shaped so many so there and so showing to show the difference from this study also found that five students found cannot use verbs in words in writing an example essay He has that has seen the problems That Belong We find we Explain a little  Then the problem of asking yourself for earlier there is support by the Study conducted by Nur Maisarah Roslan 2019 found that students cannot identify the work in in building construct questions example he for example in is support 2 this study support the emergence of the problem Okay  Okay, for example, the study is about verbs that you have a study on adjectives, for example, so you can do research by Normaliza abd rahim does not focus on the study of adjectives, it is said that the statement of the problem is wrong.  verbs because he focuses on verbs but you can't say.do not do to the study of the adjective word is said to come wrong  Cannot seem as if Of course he made verbs because we work because he sticks to words Only but you cannot say he does not make  about the active word Of course he did not make the active word because he focused on the wrong verb that is the explanation here as I said earlier there should be a sentence stated by the researcher in his article so the statement of this problem and divided into objectives Example of objective  there are two There are two paragraphs here If the objective is three there are three paragraphs one two three he suddenly Where there are three paragraphs one two three people in this person who is from the study and supported by who okay sentence like I said earlier yes kind of close said  he was then at the end of his life so he was instructed in this study. therefore this study would like to identify the discourse of the animated script text blah blah blah..  found near here that the study found that the student for example student or animated script does not symbolize what he or she is so the study according to the person said not we say the person who speaks so similar  also with this one must have support this study was found to have a problem statement in that means students cannot identify adjectives for example therefore this study wants to analyse adjectives found in writing children's essays such as example of the third problem statement okay according to nurwidad roslan 2019 students  found not found not interested and cannot count not interested or not and not cannot count numbers number 1 to 20 so we have to relate the end of the life of the paragraph Relates to the activity of the end of this life in the room to the end of this life I and he suddenly so Then there is a statement of this problem related to you have an objective so the reference in this deep reference in this study problem should be five years to  behind us we cannot take what is the name of the sun office on A long-standing study we have to understand that this study is working Now everything is different we have our technique already digital world so the boys are as smart as I said before  can you say Eh this boy is really good we asked a question he answered 10 your answers but in the world of our education now it is different which now our boys ask a question he is kept away until 47 until we say OT stop do not give the answer already  tired teacher wants to hear so There are boys until now he is here he is more there is more forward because we have a world he we each have a mobile phone each mobile phone in the bag sometimes his phone is more expensive than our flour break us yes there is in sure the statement of this problem is correct no need Length What is there a reference  in this in this and in this all there is a more detailed description in chapter two so the statement of this problem these names must be in chapter 2 Cannot you have the name of the name he met he formation no go the name you said in Coming problem  there is nothing in the chapter2 this cannot be briefly said about the statement of this problem we in detail about the study of the whole world about this person Normaliza 2009 will be a child in this whole with Length and width so the meaning is not there is this your name is hidden here  Take it here, it must be in his heart, right? He stated that this problem is very important, so usually the student wants to find out.  It is quite difficult for the writer of this problem statement now that he has learned that there is no problem.

Rujukan :

    Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2019).  Jom Tulis Tesis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(7)

PERSOALAN KAJIAN / OBJEKTIF KAJIAN (BAB 1)

Bab 1 1.4 Kalau kita tengok di sini 1.4 persoalan kajian dan 1.5 objektif kajian. Jadi kita ambil persoalan kajian . Persoalan kajian dan objektif kajian perlulah sejajar kerana ia berkaitan. Sekarang ni, contoh persoalan kajian, ‘mengenalpasti wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu’. Ini objektif dia ‘apakah wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu?’ Jadi ini kalau misalannya ,  Objektifnya dan persoalannya ada 1. Jadi persoalan teruslah kita boleh faham contohnya ‘menganalisis kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah’ kita boleh jadi dua soalan daripada satu objektif iaitu ‘sejauh manakah kesan cerita animasi rakyat Melayu  dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah’, ‘bagaimanakah Pelajar memberi pendapat melalui skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu’, jadi kedua-dua soalan ini sebenarnya akan menjawab objektif 2.

Kena ingat ya, apa sahaja dalam objektif ini kita mempersoalkan semula Sebab kita nak tahu bahawa sejauh mana kesan itu? bagaimana cara dia? Jadi itu akan menjawab objektif ini bila kita analisis data ini memang ini akan terjawab. Serupa juga macam contohnya, ‘menghasilkan repetoir perbualan melalui animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah’. Ini sebenarnya ada temubual dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah tentang skrip animasi tersebut. jadi dia bagi pendapat jadi persoalannya ‘sejauhmanakah repertoir dibina melalui animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah’. Jadi ini terjawablah dalam itu. Apakah cara perbualan dia ? Adakah cara perbualannya Memang berdua, bertiga ataupun berempat Ataupun memang dia duduk seorang tapi kalau seorang dia nak berbual dengan siapa pula ? Mungkin dengan penyelidik. Soalan ketiga ‘apakah ketegori repertoir’ yang dihasilkan dalam perbualan pelajar sekolah rendah. Jadi maknanya dia hasilkan repertoir ada tiga soalan disini. Sejauh manakah, Apakah cara perbualan, Apakah kategori. Memang Setelah itu, apabila kita menganalisis data, kita akan dapati memang terjawablah persoalan ketiga-tiga ini.

Jadi bukanlah semestinya 1 objektif 1, boleh juga 1 objektif 3 soalan, tapi sebenarnya bila kita menganalisis data memang akan terjawab ketiga-tiga soalan ini. Seperti yang nombor dua, menganalisis kesan skrip animasi akan ada dua persoalan ,bila kita analisis memang kita akan menjawab dua Soalan ini. Kita dapati memang kita jawab kedua-dua soalan ini. Objektif  satu mengenal pasti wacana tekstual  memang kita akan ada satu , boleh juga nak buat dua tapi tengoklah cara kita analisis data terjawab tak soalan tersebut. Bila kita membuat analisis, tengok balik soalan terjawab tak ? Jadi bila dah terjawab, memang betullah.

Jadi janganlah kita letak ke semua 3 objektif atau semua objektif ,cuma ada satu je soalan jadi kita boleh letak 2 atau 3. Kadang-kadang ada pelajar letak sampai empat sebab dia nak pastikan bahawa bila dia analisis data memang akan terjawab empat persoalan tersebut. Contohnya menghasilkan buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu, contohlah Kalau ada pelajar buat empat objektif jadi ‘Sejauh manakah buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dihasilkan?’ ‘Apakah cara untuk menghasilkan buku panduan penulisan animasi skrip cerita rakyat melayu?’ Jadi yang ini memang akan menjadi kebaharuan pada nombor tiga dan empat bagi awak punya thesis. Benda baharu yang kita nak sebarkan ke seluruh dunia. Jadi,yang ini kita akan ada dua persoalan. ‘Sejauh manakah buku panduan dihasilkan?’ ‘Apakah caranya?’ Jadi bila buat ni memang kita akan pastikan bila kita analisis data , pastikan kita menjawab kedua-dua soalan ini ,jadi bila kita nak tulis objektif kita pastikan, kita persoalkan apa benda yang akan kita dapati ketika kita analisis data nanti. Adakah ini , adakah itu?

Sebab itulah kita ada beberapa soalan untuk satu objektif. Ini ada dua soalan untuk satu objektif, ini ada tiga soalan ini ada dua. Tapi soalannya memang berkisahkan tentang objektif ini tadi, tak lari. Tapi sebagai penyelidik yang bagus memang dia kan persoalkan. Sebagai contoh ‘sejauh manakah repertoir dibina?’ Kemudian ‘Apakah cara perbualannya?’ Perbualan kita, kena Huraikan lah. ‘Apakah ketegorinya?’ Sebab kita nak kategorikan repertoir tersebut Untuk objektif ketiga ini. Jadi kita kene pastikan kita jawab Semua Soalan ini. Jadi pelajar, bila kita lihat apakah objektif kita, kita pastikan bahawa persoalan kita itu menjawab melalui objektif kita dan kita kena pastikan bahawa, semula saya katakan bahawa apa yang kita analisis itu akan terjawab lah soalan-soalan yang kita tanya pada diri kita untuk persoalan ini. Dan pemeriksa bila dia baca, ' Okey soalannya begini, memang saya dapati memang ada dalam bab 4, kita dapati memang pelajar tulis kategori repetoir, bermakna memang tesis ini berjaya sebab dia boleh menjawab persoalan daripada objektif yang telah dicadangkan'. Jadi pastikan bahawa 1.4 persoalan kajian, 1.5 objektif kajian.

Perkataan seperti mengenal pasti, menganalisis, menghasilkan ada dalam buku 'Jom tulis tesis', Cadangan Senarai Kata Kerja Operasional Taksonomi Bloom , jadi kita perlu  pastikan objektif 1 rendah kalau C1 itu dia rendah, kemudian objektif 2 kita nak analisis, kenalah yang tinggi. Kita tengoklah mana yang bersesuaian. Kita baca dulu, yang mana bersesuai untuk objektif kedua, kalau untuk aplikasi apa dia, untuk analisis apa dia, tadi kita pilih untuk  objektif kedua (analisis) itu dah tinggi, sudah c4,itu maknanya memang kita analisis secara mendalam. Kemudian kita nak letakkan (menghasilkan), kita letak c6, kita nak menghasilkan repertoir ataupun kita nak hasilkan buku panduan. Ini perkataan-perkataannya. Jadi pastikan bahawa, janganlah objektif satu ambil c5, awak nak nilai tiba-tiba objektif 2 rendah pula, awak masuk pula mengenalpasti, dah salah. Dia daripada kecil daripada mudah hinggalah menaik sehingga ke c6. Jadi pastikan pemilihan perkataan-perkataan itu mestilah bersesuaian objektif mengikut tahapnya, rendah ke tinggi, objektif 1 rendah ,objektif dua tinggi sikit dan objektif ketiga lagi tinggi. Janganlah objektif  satu rendah , objektif 2  awak letak tinggi betul ,c6 tadi dan objektif ketiga Awak turun pula balik. Salah! Kena ikut tingkat macam kita naik tangga daripada rendah naik naik. Jadi ambil daripada sini. Pastikan bahawa perkataan itu bersesuaian dengan objektif kita, jadi kena bersesuaian.

Dan lagi satu bila kita tulis objektif ini contohnya mengenal pasti, ada pelajar tulis nombor 2 mengenal pasti juga kemudian nombor 3 mengenal pasti  lagi. Nombor 4 mengenalpasti . Dah empat empat mengenal pasti.  Tak boleh, itu semuanya tahap yang rendah. Tahap yang rendah ini tidak bersesuaian , kita nak lah juga analisis. Jadi tak boleh. Jadi contoh di sini ada empat objektif . Biasanya objektif ada tiga sahaja. Kalau ada empat pun satu objektif berkenaan repertoir, satu lagi berkenaan buku panduan. Dia berbeza. Jadi dia bolehlah nak tukar di buku Jom tulis tesis, contohnya, daripada menghasilkan ke mengatur ,mengkategorikan ,menyusun, membangun, merumuskan dan sebagainya . Jadi bolehlah rujuk dalam buku Jom tulis tesis. Kalau tiada buku,boleh rujuk di Internet, kalau jumpa. Okay pastikan ingat yang saya katakan tadi , saya ulang balik, pastikan kategorinya daripada rendah ke tinggi sikit ke tinggi lagi supaya nampak perbezaan cara kita nak menganalisis data tersebut. Jadi pemilihan perkataan amat penting dalam penulisan objektif kajian.

 

RESEARCH QUESTIONS / RESEARCH OBJECTIVES (CHAPTER 1)

Chapter 1 1.4 If we look here 1.4 research questions and 1.5 research objectives. So we take the research question. Research questions and research objectives should be aligned as they are relevant. Right now, examples of research questions, identified discourse textual animation script Malay folklore '. This objective was 'whether the textual discourse Malay folklore animation script?' So this is if for example, there are objective and question 1. So we can understand the problems continue instance 'to analyze the effect of animation script Malay folklore among schoolchildren' we can be two questions from the objectives of 'the extent of the impact of the animated story of Malay among primary school students,' 'How students give opinions through animation script Malay folklore', so the two will actually answer this question objective 2.

Remember , whatever in this objective we question again Because we want to know that to what extent the effect? how is she So that will answer this objective when we analyze this data indeed this will be answered. A similar kind of example, 'produced by an animated conversation repetoir Malay folklore among elementary school students. This is actually an interview among primary school students about the animated script. so he of opinion so the question 'to what extent is built through animation repertoire Malay folklore among schoolchildren. So this is answered in that. How does he talk? Is the way he talks It is indeed two, three or four Or is he sitting alone but if one he wants to talk to whom? Probably with researchers. The third question is ‘what is the category of repertoire’ generated in the conversation of primary school students. So that means he created a repertoire there are three questions here. To what extent, What is the way of conversation, What is the category. Indeed After that, when we analyze the data, we will find that the questions of these three are indeed answered.

So it is not necessarily 1 objective 1, it can also be 1 objective 3 questions, but in fact when we analyze the data these three questions will indeed be answered. As number two, analyzing the effect of animated script will have two questions, when we analyze it we will answer these two Questions. We find that we do answer these two questions. The objective of one is to identify the textual discourse, indeed we will have one, we can also want to make two, but look at the way we analyze the data to answer the question. When we do the analysis, look back at the questions answered? So when it is answered, it is true.

So we do not put all 3 objectives or all objectives, there is only one question so we can put 2 or 3. Sometimes there are students who put up to four reasons he wants to make sure that when he analyzes the data will be answered the four questions. For example, a handbook scriptwriting animation folklore Malay, For example, If any student for four objectives to be 'How well manual script writing animation folklore Malay produced?' 'What a way to produce a guidebook writing animation scripts folklore wither?' So that this will indeed be a novelty in numbers three and four for you to have a thesis. New things we want to spread all over the world. So, this one we will have two questions. 'To what extent is the handbook produced?' 'What is the way?' So when we do this we will make sure when we analyze the data, make sure we answer these two questions, so when we want to write our objectives make sure, we ask what things will we find out when we analyze the data later. Is this, is that it?

That is why we have several questions for one objective. This has two questions for one objective, these have three questions this has two. But the question is about this objective just now, do not run away. But as a good researcher, he did question it. For example, ‘How far is the repertoire built?’ Then ‘What is the way of conversation?’ Our conversation, should be described. ‘What is the category?’ Because we want to categorize the repertoire For this third objective. So we here make sure we answer All these Questions. So students, when we see what our objectives are, we make sure that our questions are answered through our objectives and we have to make sure that, again I say that what we analyze will be answered the questions we ask ourselves for this question . And the examiner when he read, 'Okay the question is like this, I did find it is in chapter 4, we find that the student wrote the repetoir category, meaning that this thesis is successful because he can answer the question from the proposed objective'. So make sure that 1.4 research questions, 1.5 research objectives.

Words like identify, analyze, produce are in the book 'Let's write a thesis', Bloom's Taxonomic Operational Vocabulary List Proposal, so we need to make sure objective 1 is low if C1 is low, then objective 2 we want analysis, must be high. Let's see which one fits. We read first, which is suitable for the second objective, if for what application he is, for what analysis he is, earlier we chose for the second objective (analysis) it is already high, already c4, that means we do in-depth analysis. Then we want to put (produce), we put c6, we want to produce a repertoire or we want to produce a guidebook. These are his words. So make sure that, do not objective one take c5, you want the value of suddenly objective 2 is low, you go in to identify, it is wrong. He ranged from small to easy up to c6. So make sure the selection of the words must be appropriate objectives according to the level, low to high, objective 1 low, objective two slightly higher and the third objective again high. Do not let objective one low, objective 2 you place high correctly, c6 earlier and the third objective You go down again. Wrong! We have to follow the floor like we go up the stairs from the low up and up. So take it from here. Make sure that the word fits our objective, so it has to fit.

And one more thing when we write this objective for example identify, there are students write number 2 identify also then number 3 identify again. Number 4 identifies. Already four four identified. No, that's all low level. This low level is not suitable, we also want analysis. So you can't. So for example here there are four objectives. Usually there are only three objectives. If there are four, one is the objective regarding the repertoire, the other is about the handbook. He is different. So he can want to change in the book Let's write a thesis, for example, from producing to organizing, categorizing, organizing, developing, formulating and so on. So you can refer to the book Let's write a thesis. If you do not have a book, you can refer to the Internet, if you can find it. Okay make sure to remember what I said earlier, I repeat, make sure the category from low to high a little to high again so that you can see the difference in the way we want to analyze the data. So the choice of words is very important in writing the objectives of the study.

 Rujukan :

    Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2019).  Jom Tulis Tesis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(6)

 

Batasan Kajian (Bab 1)#JomTulisTesis

 

Kita sambung dalam bab 1 tak ada satu point tujuh iaitu batasan Kajian yang ini juga Pelajar selalu buat silap ya ataupun Dia terlupa nak letak jadi biasanya kalau saya saya cadangkan dalam tulisan batasan kajian mulanya awak boleh buat dalam bentuk jadual Okey dalam bentuk jadual jadi ini batasan dia yang ini justifikasi Lepaskanlah kita nak menyatakan Kepada kita kenapa kita pilih Kenapa kita pilih semua itu kenapa kita buat surat sendiri Jadi kita kena letak contohnya Kita letak pasal 20 pelajar. 20 pelajar SK Serdang contonyanya jadi beri justifikasi kenapa awak pilih 20 pelajar tersebut  okey sekarang awak  pilih 20 pelajar tadi  9 tahun Okey kenapa awak pilih ni Kenapa awak pilih pelajar 20 pelajar daripada SK Serdang Jadi kalau jumlah dia kenapa 20 Kenapa tak 30 Kenapa tak 21 kenapa tak 19 beri justifikasi kemudian Kenapa sk sekolah sk serdang awak nak letak yang kedua, boleh kenapa SK serdang okey jadi nyatakan  Kenapa tak sekolah dekat Perlis Kenapa bukan sekolah dekat Terengganu jadi awak kena bagi justifikasi lh kenapa  sekolah ini kemudian apa lagi apa pemilihan awak punya ni biasanya batasan kajian ini lebih kepada awak ambil daripada metodologi okey daripada metodologi tentang dia punya sampel atau pon responden lokasi kajian atau pun awak pakai buku teks bahasa melayu tingkatan 5 kenapa, kenapa pilih itu beri justifikasi okey dalam justifikasi ini awak boleh letak ayat awak justifikasi dan kemudian letaklah kalau misalnya awak ada rujukan yang Normaliza Abdul Rahim 2019 mengatakan bahawa ini ini ini dia kataka bahawa memang boleh 20 pelajar awak letak justifikasi kenapa pemilihan SK serdang menurut menteri pendidika contohnya SK Serdang merupakan sekolah luar badar yang sekian sekian sekian jadi awak letak ini ringkas ya dalam justifikasi kerana ini jadual ya. Jadual berapa ini justifikasi bla bla.kemudian awak huraikan pula sekarang ini. ini telah tulis dalam bentuk jadual ini ambil daripada metodologi apa dia kalau awak kata awak pakai temubual. Temubual secara ini dan kenapa justifikasi itu. Dia benda- benda ini perlu ada justifikasi. kadang-kadang orang tidak letak sebab sudah memang mengetahui buat temubual apa semua tidak perlu letaklah ini yang penting ialah siapa sampel? kenapa umur dia 9 tahun? kenapa lokasi dekat situ?kenapa tidak buat di negeri lain? kenapa tidak buat dekat korea? contohnya. Jadi kenalah ada justifikasi dia kemuadian bila sini jadual berapa di atas okey awak pun huraikan..huaraikan satu- satu berserta ulang balik ini ayat panjang memberi justifikasi kenapa pemilihan 20 pelajar? kenapa SK serdang jadi hurailah  dengan lebih jelas lagi dan lebih panjang lebar lagi supaya tidak ada persoalan daripada memeriksa katakan nnti dia tengok analisis data ataupu bab 3 20 awak tak kata pun dalam batasa kajian awak pilih 20 boleh ke 20? mulalah sebenarnya cerita  pasal pelajar je.Soalan yang ditanya oleh pemeriksa adalah 20 soalan tentang pelajar je memang masa itu terkedu tidak boleh nak jawab soalan. Jadi bila sudah ada sini memeriksa baca balik tengok jadual baca balik oh saya faham kenapa dia buat begini sudah ada justifikasinya contohnya kenapa novel bertajuk salina ya kenapa novel salina kenapa bukan novel ada lagi berapa ratus novel dekat pasaran dekat DBP. Jadi awak boleh justifikasikan novel salina ini kerana memenangi anugerah bla bla bla atau dengan menjadi buku teks tingkatan 5 pada  tahun sekian sekian. Jadi awak letaklh justifikasi itu sebagai apa dan pastikan justifikasi awak letak terhadap batasan kajian ini memang justifikasi yang menyerlah dan contohnya ada pelajar dia buat tentang majalah A contohnya pastu saya tanya kenapa awak pilih majalah A tu kemudian pelajar jawab dalam justifikasi saya sudah tulis bahawa majalah A ini telah memenangi anugerah sekian sekian pada tahun sekian sekian sekian bolehlah kita ambil sebagai itu contohnya yang lain iaitu batasa tentang cerpen. Cerpen ini ambil tahun 2015 cerpen itu ambil daripada majalah sekian sekian sekian jadi  bolehlah justifkasi dia  memenangi anugerah juga tapi boleh ambil situ justifikasi ini mesti perkara yang penting dan penyebab  awak pilih bahan itu kenapa awak pilih sampel itu? kenapa umur ini. Jadi semua itu perlu ada justifikasi dalam bentuk jadual kemudian buat huraian dibawah ini supaya ia lebih jelas. Bila jelas memang tidak ada persoalan daripada pemeriksa dan juga dalam ini kita ada penanda wacana supaya kita nampak sebagai penulisan akademik itu amat penting. Jangan lupa tentang batasan kajian.

 

 

Limitations of the Study (Chapter 1)#JomTulisTesis

 

We continue in chapter 1 there is not a single point seven, which is the limitations of this study. he is this justification Let go we want to state To us why we choose Why we choose all that why we make our own letter So we have to put for example We put about 20 students. 20 students of SK Serdang for example so justify why you chose 20 students are okay now you chose 20 students 9 years ago Okay why did you choose this Why did you choose 20 students from SK Serdang So if the number is why 20 Why not 30 Why not 21 why tak 19 give justification later Why sk school sk serdang you want to put the second, can why SK serdang okey so state Why not school near Perlis Why not school near Terengganu so you have to justify lh why this school then what else what choice do you have here usually limitation of this study is to the body taken from the methodology okay from the methodology of his samples or pound responder location study or anybody adopted textbooks malay form 5 why, why choose it give justification okay in this justification you can park paragraph crew justification and then put if for example you have a reference that Normaliza Abdul Rahim 2019 says that this is this he said that it is possible for your 20 students to justify why the election of SK serdang according to the minister of education for example SK Serdang is a school outside badar so much so you put this brief yes in justification because this is the schedule yes. What is the schedule for this justification blah blah… Then you explain it now. this has been written in the form of this table take from what methodology he is if you say you use interview. Interview in this way and why that justification. He these things need justification. sometimes people do not put because they already know for an interview what all do not need to put this is what is important is who is the sample? why is he 9 years old? why is the location near there? why not make it in another country? why not make it near korea? for example. So there must be a justification for him then when here is the schedule how much above is okay you also explain... describe one by one along with this repetition a long sentence justifies why the selection of 20 students? why SK serdang so explain more clearly and even longer so that there is no question than checking say nnti he looks at data analysis or chapter 3 20 you did not even say in the study limit you choose 20 can to 20? actually start the story about the student je. The question asked by the examiner is 20 questions about the student je indeed that time was stunned cannot want to answer the question. So when I was here to check read back look at the read-read schedule oh I understand why he did this there is justification for example why a novel titled salina yes why a salina novel why not a novel there are still hundreds of novels near the market near DBP. So you can justify this salina novel for winning the blah blah blah award or by being a form 5 textbook in so many years. So you put the justification as what and make sure your justification is against the limitations of this study is a clear justification and for example there are students he made about magazine A for example then I asked why you chose magazine A then student answered in justification I have written that magazine A this has won so many awards in so many years that we can take it as another example which is the limitations of short stories. This short story was taken in 2015, the short story was taken from a magazine so much so that it can be justified that he won the award as well but can take it there this justification must be an important thing and the reason you choose the material why did you choose the sample? why this age. So all that needs to be justified in the form of a table then make a description below so that it is clearer. When it is clear that there is no question from the examiner and also in this we have discourse markers so that we see as academic writing is very important. Do not forget about the limitations of the study.

Rujukan :

    Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2019).  Jom Tulis Tesis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(5)

 

Menulis Artikel untuk Terbitan dalam Jurnal. Jom Tulis artikel.

Biasanya pelajar Master atau pelajar PhD biasanya diawajibkan untuk menulis artikel untuk terbitan. Jadi kita boleh, saya boleh ajar serba ringkas bagaimana kita nak tulis artikel yang baik. Yang boleh kita terbitkan. Jadi pada pelajar yang belum pernah terbit dia akan rasa banggalah. Biasanya artikel dan jurnal atau bab dalam buku biasanya hampir sama. Jadi kita ada disini kita ada tajuk, tajuk mestilah yang meanarik ya. Sehingga orang nak baca artikel kita. Kita sertakan abstrak. Abstark kita terpulang kepada jurnal tersebut. Yang mempunyai berapa patah perkataan. Kadang-kadang 250 hingga 300 kemudian ada pengenalan ada sorortan kajian. Sorotan kajian ini terpulang kepada penulis masing-masing. Kadang-kadang dia tak letak sorotan kajian. Dia letak tajuk macam contoh animasi cerita rakyat. Letak itu dalam tu merupakan sorotan. Kemudian ada metadologi keputusan dan perbincangan kesimpulan dan rujukan. Bukan bibliografi dah dia rujukan. Jadi dalam yang ini, kita fokus pada tajuk. Tajuk kenalah menarik. Biasanya tajuk tu kalau jurnal ke artikel ke biasanya tak boleh lebih daripada 20 patah perkataan. Jadi abstrak ini kita, kalau tulis dalam bahasa Melayu kita tulis abstrak disertakan dengan abstark bahasa Inggeris. Supaya lebih jelas. Dalam abstark ini kita akan letak macam contohnya, ayat lebih kurang 5 ayat. 4 atau 5 ayat macam ayat mukadimah. Mukadimah ni contohnya kita letak seperti latar belakang, dan juga masalah yang dihadapi, masalah kajian sehingga timbulnya kita nak buat ini. Ayat ini diikuti dengan objektif. Kemudian ada metadologi. Metadologi ini kita kena letak kalau ada sampel-sampel dan seterusnyalah, lokasi. Kalau tidak ada tak payah letak. Kemudian semualah. Prosedur kena ada. Cara analisis macam mana. Kemudian daripada hurai kesini kita letakkan kita punya keputusan. Keputusan kajian kita letak dalam abstrak. Kita letak keputusan dan ayat akhir kita akan letak apa yang awak harapkan dalam kajian akan datang. Diharapkan kajian akan datang akan memberi fokus kepada apa dia-apa dia. Ayat akhir mesti ada. Kemudian disertai dengan kata kunci. Kata kunci biasanya ada 5. Teruskan dengan pengenalan. Biasanya, pengenalan ini awak boleh letak dalam lebih kurang kita nak kenal ni kita letak latar belakang, cerita tentang ciri-ciri apa benda yang berkaitan dengan tajuk kita mengkaji. Pengenalan kadang-kadang letak dalam dalam satu perenggan. Ini agak penting kerana ada jurnal yang dia sangat-sangat ketat. Pengenalan ni adalah orang letak dalam bentuk sorotan. Jadi itu yang kena reject. Jadi terpulang kepada jurnal yang adalah. Baca balik apa arahan yang diberi. Satu perenggan ni letak macam latar belakang. Kemudian masuk yang sorotan jadi ini satu perenggan. Sorotan tu macam saya kata awak boleh letak kertas sorotan kajian ataupun awak boleh letak tajuk dia. Macam contohnya, animasi cerita rakyat. Boleh antara dua. Jadi sorotan. Yang ini awak letak dalam 4 perenggan. Yang mempunyai sorotan kajian 5 tahun kebelakang sahaja. Dan juga perlu kritis. Macam saya ajar dalam bab 2 kalau tak kritiskan dia berdiri dengan diri sendiri je. Tak boleh macam tu. Maknanya bila huraian dalam satu perenggan ada satu nama. Kemudan sokonglah dengan kajian-kajian yang lain. Selari ke hampir sama ke apa sokong ke. Letak di situ, juga letak yang negatif yang seperti kajian ini orang kata kajian oleh Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019 didapati tidak bersetuju dengan kajian yang dijalankan oleh sipulan. Kenapa? Itu namanya kritis mencari persamaan dan perbezaan. Ini dah 4 perenggan, kemudian masuk sebelum habis sorotan kajian ada ayat objektif, ayat objektif bukan satu sub topik. Biasanya ayat sahaja. Dalam satu ayat iaitu justeru kajian ini. Justeru daripada sorotan, masalah kajian semua sini ada jurang penyelidikan. Jadi justeru kajian ini mengenal pasti dan membincangkan apa. Satu ayat je. Iaitu selepas sorotan kajian. Makna ini dah perenggan baru. Jadi ini perenggan lainlah. Jadi perenggan tu ada satu je ayat. Kemudian terus masuk tajuk metadologi. Metadologi ni kena lengkapkan semua yanga ada dalam metadologi. Awak kena huraikan sebiji yang ada dalam tesis. Ada sel ada lokasi ada prosedur, ada analisis ada bahan. Kalau misalnya ada bahan awak kena letak sinopsis bahan. Sinopsis bahan contohnya, sinopsis cerpen contohnya. Apa sahaja. Semua kene ada. Awak boleh rujuk, rujuk balik dalam bab metadologi penulisan tesis kemudian baru masuk tajuk keputusan dan perbincangan. Keputusan dan perbincangan ini teori pun ada. Dalam metadologi keputusan perbincangan ini dia punya sub tajuk kenalah kalau misalnya ikut teori sub tajuk ikut teori. Contohnya, kandungan dalam interaksi perbualan. Jadi maknnaya, tajuk ini merupakan daripad teori, lepastu dengan konteks dalam interkasi pebualan, andaian interkasi perbualan, huraian dia dalam ini sama dengan huraian bab 4. Jadi yang ini terpulang kepada teori awak. Kita ada banyak teori. Teori analisis wacana teori yang saya ingat sekarang. Ada banyak lagi teori, tepri kejuruteraan lain, sains lain, ekonomi lain, reka bentuk lain, jadi berbeza, lepas habis keputusan perbincangan kita ada rumusan, kalau tengok kat sini sebelum kesimpunlan tu ada nak rumuskan keputusan perbincagan. Kita ada rumusan, rumuskan dalam 1 perenggan, sama juga dalam bab 4 tesis kita, kita rumuskan kita kena sokong. Sokong kajian yang atas tadi. Dekat sorotan. Kita ada yang ada dalam tesis makna yang ada dalam tesis. Dalam artikel. Atas tadi yang kita, yang ada dalam ini. Jadi sokong. Sokong itu kemudian sokong diri, sama cara penulisan dia. Cara penulisan nak buat rumusan dalam bab 4. Kemudian akhirnya kesimpulan. Dalam kesimpulan ini, dalam ini saya akan jelaskan apa yang sepatutnya ada dalam kesimpulan. Dalam kesimpulan ini menjelaskan memberi manafaat, menjelaskan manfaat yang diperoleh daripada keputusan kajian. Maknanya awak jelaskan manfaat kepada siapa. Keputusan yang kita dapat ini, nak  manfaat kepada siapa. Jelaskan tiap-tiap satu. Dalam satu perenggan. Okay, kemudian ayat akhir. Kasimpulan itu tadi ini samalah yang dengan awak manfaat tadi. Memberi manfaat kepada siapa dalam kesimpulan. Dalam ini tidak perlu rujukan. Jangan ada rujukan pula dalam kesimpulan sebab kita dah ada rujukan sokong, kesimpulan ini nak beri manfaat sahaja jadi tak perlu letak rujukan. Kemudian ayat akhir dalam kesimpulan, kita letaklah “Diharapkan kajian akan datang” ingat tak yang ayat saya cakap tadi. Ayat tu ada dalam abstrak. Jangan copy paste, ubah sikit ayat tu. Ada dalam abstrak. Iaitu “Diharapkan kajian akan datang memberi fokus kepada lirik lagu cerita rakyat”, contohnya. Jadi ada kaitan. Ini macam cadangan akan datang kita. Inilah kita masuk dalam ayat akhir. Jadi dalam ini, terpulang sebenar kepada jurnal atau bab dalam buku. Jumlah perketaan biasanya 5500. Ada yang orang kata, jurnal yang sangat ketat peraturan dia kata, okay satu artikel dia boleh terima 3000. Jadi jangan lebih, kalau lebih biasanya dia suruh bayar. Terpulang kepada jurnal. Ada jurnal dia kata perlu 10000. Ikut jelah patah perkataan dia. Ada jurnal dia punya sub topik ini berbeza. Kita ikut. Terpulang kepada jurnal. Ini yang biasa. Ada jurnal yang kata ini. Jadi tulisan artikel untuk artikel untuk jurnal dan artikel untuk bab dalam buku juga sama sebenarnya. Penulisan ini biasanya memang kita kena ada. Kalau penulisan untuk pelajar sastera pun sama. Memang kena ada pengenalan, kena ada ayat objektif, keputusan perbincangan pun sama, cara menganalisis, tengok awak pakai jadual, taknak pakai jadual, awak nak sokong macam saya katakan awak nak sokong dekat rumusan ke. Awak nak sokong dekat data ke. Masa huraian pun boleh. Tidak ada masalah. Biasa ini adalah penulisan artikel jurnal untuk semua bidang. Mungkin yang lain terpulang kepada arahan. Yang diberi oleh jurnal tersebut. Jadi yang penting juga, satu kena ada penanda wacana. Tiap-tiap halamna tesis kena ada, artikel pun nak ada. Nanti bila dah habis awak buat tesis, awak hafal penanda wacana. Beratus penada wacana. Dalam buku ni sikit je, mungkin ada lagi banyak yang awak kena hafal. Penanda wacana mesti penting. Kemudian awak perlu semak banyak kali. Semak dari segi ejaan, tatabahasa, semua. Semua kena semak. Lepas tu semak juga rujukan. Okay rujukan dalam artikel ada dalam rujukan. Dan juga, ini mesti ada. Ingat ya baca arahan berkali-kali. Dan juga penting macam saya kata tadi, tajuk artikel tak menarik orang pun tak nak baca. Kata kunci penting kerana disini kalau kita type kat Google artikel akan keluar. Kena pastikan semua kepentingan semua ada dalam artikel awak. Kalau lihat disini, serupa juga dalam ini kena 70% rujukan terkini. Jumlah semua artikel, semua rujukan, ini jumlah 5 tahun kebelakang darab 100 sama dengan mesti 70%. Kebanyakan artikel, pastikan tahun yang awak hantar artikel itu contohnya 2020, artikel yang 2020 ni mesi ada sekurangnya 3. Tahun terkini mesti ada 3. Janganlah misalnya awak hantar artikel tu 2020, 2020 punya artikel tak ada. Tidak boleh mesti kena ada. Jadi jumlah 70%. dalam 70% ni ada minima 3 artikel yang tahun itu. Tahun yang hantar, tahun terkini. Kalau 2020, 2020. Kalau sebut artikel ini tidak susah. Kajian dari tesis itu ubah ayat dia jadikan artikel. Kita ni sebagai penyelidik kutip data. Kadang-kadang data berlebih. Kita kena kutip data lebih tak boleh cuckup-cukup. Kadang-kadang pelajar tanya saya, “Prof saya punya data sudah ambil, saya temubual pelajar, kebetulan kawan dia ada disitu, jadi saya temubual, jadi data saya lebih.” Baguslah saya kata, sebab mugkin data ini tidak cukup boleh guna data yang lebih. Perlu mohon kebenaran untuk mengutip data. Kementerian kalau nak pergi sekolah. Semua perlukan kebenaran, kecuali awak nak ambil data daripada anak buah kat rumah juga perlu kebenaran. Mahu kakak abang tak tegur 5 tahun kalau ambil video anak dia masukkan dalam tesis. Tak dapat duit raya. Jadi perlukan kebenaran bertulis. Kalau kebenaran yang video ada juga boleh. Kalau kena saman sekurang-kurangnya awak ada. “Ini dia sebenarnya kebenaran saya dapat.” “Atapun dia tanya mana kebenaran, awak disaman RM250000 sebab tanpa kebenaran awak temu bual pekerja saya dari syarikat.” “Saya ada kebenaran daripada ini kebetulan pengurus besar dia kata boleh videokan pakai untuk kebenaran.” Artikel ini semua ada kebenaran. Letakkan nama sampel contohnya, jangan letak nama sebenar. Nati semua budak yang nama dia contohnya Muhammad Yusoh ada lebih kurang 450 datang tuntut saman kenapa guna nama saya dalam ini.

 

 

TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS:

 

Write Articles for Publications in Journals.

Let's Write an article. Usually Master students or PhD students are required to write an articles for a publication. So we can, I can teach you briefly how we want to write a good article. That we can publish. So for students who were never been published yet, they will feel proud. Usually articles and journals or chapters in books are almost the same. So we are here we have a title, the title must be interesting. So that people want to read our article. We include an abstract. Our abstract is up to the journal. Which has how many words. Sometimes 250 to 300 then there is an introduction there is a study highlight. The highlights of this study are up to the respective authors. Sometimes he does not place the focus of the study. He put a title like an animated example of folklore. The location inside is a highlight. Then there is the methodology of the results and the discussion of conclusions and references. Not a bibliography, he is a reference. So in this one, we focus on the title. The title should be interesting. Usually the title if the journal to the article to usually can not be more than 20 words. So this abstract we, if we write in languages other than English abstract writing accompanied by abstract English. To be clearer. In this abstract we will place an example, a sentence of about 5 sentences. 4 or 5 verses like the opening verse. For example, we put this preface as the background, as well as the problems faced, the problems of the study until the emergence we want to do this. This sentence is followed by an objective. Then there is the methodology. We have to put this methodology if there are samples and then, location. If there is no need to place. Then everything. Procedures must be in place. What kind of analysis. Then from the description here we put we have a decision. The results of our study are in the abstract. We put the results and our final sentence will put what you expect in the next study. Hopefully the next study will focus on what he is. The last sentence must be there. Then accompanied by keywords. Keywords usually have 5. Continue with the introduction. Usually, this introduction you can put in more or less we want to know here we put the background, the story of the characteristics of what things are related to the topic we are studying. Introduction is sometimes placed in a single paragraph. This is quite important because there are journals that he is very, very strict. This introduction is people put in the form of highlights. So that's what to reject. So it depends on the journal that is. Read back what instructions were given. This paragraph is like a background. Then enter the highlight so this is a paragraph. The highlight is like I said you can put the study highlight paper or you can put the title of it. For example, folklore animation. Can be between two. So the spotlight. This one you put in 4 paragraphs. Which has highlighted the study 5 years ago only. And it also needs to be critical. Like I taught in chapter 2 if you do not criticize him standing with himself je. It can't be like that. Meaning when the description in a paragraph there is a name. Then support with other studies. Parallel to almost the same to what support to. Put it there, also put a negative that like this study people say the study by Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019 was found to disagree with the study conducted by whistling. Why? That is the critical name for finding similarities and differences. This is already 4 paragraphs, then enter before the end of the study highlights there are objective sentences, objective sentences are not a sub-topic. Usually sentences only. In one sentence that is why this study. Hence from the spotlight, the study problem all here has a research gap. So this study identifies and discusses what. One verse je. That is after the highlights of the study. This means a new paragraph. So this is another paragraph. So that paragraph has one verse. Then continue to enter the title of the methodology. This methodology must complete everything in the methodology. You have to describe the one in the thesis. There are cells there are locations there are procedures, there is analysis there are materials. If for example there is material you have to put a synopsis of the material. Synopsis of material for example, synopsis of short stories for example. Whatever. Everything here is there. You can refer, refer back in the thesis methodology chapter chapter then just enter the title of the decision and discussion. These results and discussions are also theoretical. In the methodology of the results of this discussion, he has a sub-title that should be followed, for example, follow the theory of sub-headings follow the theory. For example, content in a conversation interaction. As example, this title is from the theory, then with the context in the conversation conversation, the assumption of the conversation interaction, the description of him in this is the same as the description of chapter 4. So this is up to your theory. We have many theories. Theoretical discourse analysis theory I remember now. There are many more theories, other engineering theory, other sciences, other economics, other designs, so different, after the end of the discussion we have a conclusion, if you look here before the conclusion there is to summarize the results of the discussion. We have a conclusion, formulate in 1 paragraph, just like in chapter 4 of our thesis, we formulate we have to support. Support the above study. Near the spotlight. We have what is in the thesis the meaning that is in the thesis. In the article. On top of that we, who are in this. So support. Support that then support yourself, the same way he writes. How to write want to make a conclusion in chapter 4. Then finally the conclusion. In this conclusion, in this I will explain what should be in the conclusion. In this conclusion explains the benefits, explains the benefits derived from the results of the study. That means you explain the benefits to whom. The result we get this, want to benefit who. Explain each one. In one paragraph. Okay, then the last sentence. The conclusion was just the same as the benefits you had earlier. Benefit to whom in conclusion. In this there is no need for reference. Do not have a reference in the conclusion because we already have a supporting reference, this conclusion is only useful so there is no need to place a reference. Then the final sentence in the conclusion, we put "Hopefully the next study" remember the sentence I said earlier. That verse is in the abstract. Do not copy paste, slightly change the sentence. It is in the abstract. That is "It is hoped that future studies will focus on the lyrics of folklore songs", for example. So there is a connection. This is our kind of future proposal. This is what we enter in the last sentence. So in this, it really depends on the journal or chapter in the book. The number of cities is usually 5500. Some people say, a very strict journal of the rules he said, okay one article he can accept 3000. So do not over, if more he usually told to pay. Depends on the journal. There is a journal he says needs 10000. Follow his broken words. There is a journal he has this sub-topic is different. Let's go. Depends on the journal. This is normal. There are journals that say this. So writing articles for articles for journals and articles for chapters in books is also actually the same. This writing is usually something we have to have. If writing for literary students is the same. There must be an introduction, there must be an objective sentence, the results of the discussion are the same, how to analyze, see you use the schedule, do not want to use the schedule, you want to support like I said you want to support near the formula. You want to back up the data. Description time is also possible. No problem. This is usually the writing of journal articles for all fields. Maybe the rest is up to the instructions. Given by the journal. So importantly, one must have a discourse marker. Every thesis page must be there, an article must be there. Later when you finish your thesis, you memorize the discourse markers. Hundreds of discourse speakers. In this book a little, there may be many more that you have to memorize. Discourse markers must be important. Then you need to check many times. Check in terms of spelling, grammar, everything. Everything has to be checked. Then check the reference as well. Okay the reference in the article is in the reference. And also, this must be there. Remember to read the instructions many times. And also important as I said earlier, the title of the article does not attract people who do not want to read. Keywords are important because here if we type in Google the article will come out. Make sure all the interests are in your article. If you look here, it is similar in this to the 70% latest reference. The sum of all the articles, all the references, this is the sum of the last 5 years multiplied by 100 equals must be 70%. Most articles, make sure the year you submit the article is for example 2020, the article that 2020 must have at least 3. The current year must be 3. Do not say for example you submit the article 2020, 2020 has no articles. Must not have to exist. So the amount is 70%. in 70% of this there are a minimum of 3 articles that year. Year of delivery, current year. If 2020, 2020. To mention this article is not difficult. The study of the thesis changed the sentence he made into an article. We are as researchers collecting data. Sometimes the data is too much. We have to collect more data. Sometimes students ask me, "Professor I have already collect may data, I interviewed students, it just so happened that his friend was there, so I interviewed, so I have extra data." Well I say, because maybe this data is not enough to use more data. Need permission to request data collection. Ministry if you want to go to school. Everyone needs permission, unless you want to take data from the people at home also need permission. Want my older brother not to reprimand 5 years if he takes a video of his son included in the thesis. Can't get public money. So you need written permission. If the truth is that the video is also available. If you get sued, at least you have. "This is actually the truth I got." "Or he asked where the truth is, you were summoned RM250000 because without permission you interviewed my employee from the company." "I have permission from this, it just so happens that the general manager said he can use video for permission." This article is all true. Put the name of the sample for example, do not put the real name. Later on all the boys whose name is for example Muhammad Yusoh there are about 450 came to demand a suit why use my name in this.

 

Rujukan :

    Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2019).  Jom Tulis Tesis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(4)

                                        

Menulis Bibliografi #JomTulisTesis

Bibliografi. Bibliografi ni penting, memang semua penting. Semua bab dalam tesis penting. Semua penulisan penting. Bibliografi pun penting. Jadi bila kita nak buat bibliografi, kita kena konsisten, kita sama ada buat gaya APA atau MLA. Tetapi biasanya pelajar dia suka yang APA ni katanya mudah, tapi bila kita tengok buat salah juga. Jadi, bibliografi ini, kalau kita tengok biasalah. Kalau tengok dalam buku ni saya ada letak contoh bagaimana nak tulis rujukan dalam bentuk APA. Sebab kalau saya letak dua-dua, biasanyalah kalau tesis memang APA. Jadi kena pastikan bahawa kalau jurnal. Nama jurnal italic. Jadi kalau kita lihat contoh-contoh yang terdapat dalam ini, kejap ya, okey. Kita adalah semua sekali. Macam mana kita nak, dekat bibliografi dan rujukan. Contoh nama melayu kita nak rujuk macam mana. Contohnya kalau contoh bibliografi dan rujukan nama Siti Nur Aliaa Roslan. Kemain la panjangnya, contohnya nama melayu kena letak nama melayu semua panjang-panjang lebar tu. Yelah maklumlah, zaman sekarangkan nama Melayu ada tiga perkataan. Ada sampai empat perkataan. Ada yang sampai lima penat cikgu nak tulis kat dalam masa sekolah nanti. Sebab itulah nama contohnya, nama Alim Al Mustakim Billah akhirnya mak dia, pergi buat cop jadi buku tu semua dia cop je. Tak larat nak tulis dengan tangan. Jadi nama Melayu letak nama penuh. Dan dalam biblio pun penuh dalam rujukan pun penuh. Dalam tesis ni dalam bibliografi begitu. Jadi semuanya nama begini. Kalau nama Cin Li Li contohnya letak Cin ataupun bukan bibliografi letak Cin.L.L dalam bibliografi. Nama Arumugammutusami bagaimana. Nama Jepun bagaimana, dan seterusnya. Ada contoh -contoh jadi kalau misalnya kita lihat dalam buku ini. Kalau rujukan dalam tesis kita letak kalau ni Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) dalam kurungan. Kemudian ada, jadi kalau ada kurungan semua letak kurungan semua tiada koma. Jadi ini titik dua kalau ada halaman dan seterusnya. Kita ada banyak contoh-contoh kita ya. Jadi dia, bibliografi hendaklan mengandungi maklumat seperti berikut. Jadi ini ada semua maklumat-maklumat dia. Jadi penulisan rujukan dalam tesis bagaimana. Ini semua arahan. Jadi ada cara-cara penulisan semua ada dalam ini supaya tidak keliru. Apa yang saya nak jelaskan disini pastikan apa penulisan dia mesti betul dalam bibliografi. Dan juga yang penting, ini dalam tesis ini bibliografi. Apa yang awak rujuk dalam tesis perlu ada dalam bibliografi. Kemudian semak. Saya suka semak secara manual. Maknanya, saya print bibliografi letak tepi, laptop letak kat sini, tengok muka surat satu satu satu letak. Kalau yang dah tag kita letak warna merah dekat laptop, bibliografi kita tanda right. Lepastu ini right. Sebab kalau buat manual memang betul. Kita bukan tak nak percaya sangat dekat mesin ni, bukan tak percaya ya. Memang tak percaya. Mesin nama pun mesin. Jadi dalam tesis ada rujukan tu dalam bibliografi ada rujukan tu. Ni sebelum nak hantar tesis ni. Kemudian kita semak dalam biblio ada tick nama tu kenalah dalam tesis pun ada. Bermakna, kita kena cross referency. Bermakna kedua duanya pasti ada. Yang tidak ada, buang. Janganlah becita-cita nak bibliografi sampai 10-15 halaman sedangkan tidak ada pun dalam tesis. Memang kita permiksa kita semak satu-satu. Sebab itu tugas pemeriksa. Itulah kerja saya. Saya baca dalam tesis saya buka saya tengok belakang saya right. Saya baca contohnya, dalam ini namanya Muhammad Mustakim Roslan 2019 tiba tiba dekat belakang Muhammad Mustakim Roslan 2018 pulak. Sudah lain pulak tu macam seolah ada dua artikel berbeza. Jadi salah, macam contohnya biblografi ada Amal Mustakim Roslam 2019 tengok dekat dalam Amal Mustakim Roslan 2015 memang tak kenalah. Dua-dua salah. Jadi pastikan semak satu-satu. Okey untuk tesis. Memang lah untuk tesis dan juga untuk artikel pun macam tu ye. Kita perlu ada 70% rujukan terkini. Terkini maknanya macam saya katakan mestilah rujukan yang 5 tahun kebelakang. Jadi yang itulah yang awak pastikan kalau awak hantar tesis pada 2023. Maknanya, 5 tahun kebelakang 2019. 5 tahun kebelakang. Okay 70% makna apa yang awak buat ialah jumlah kesemua dulu. Semua dalam bibliografi kemudian jumlah contohnya, jumlah ada 100 semua sekali dalam tesis dia. Kemudian saya kira yang 5 tahun kebelakang. 5 tahun kebelakang saya kira ada 70. 70 ya. Jadi awak tekan awak punya kalkulator dekat phone awak yang mahal daripada saya tu. Jadi awak tekan kalkulator jadi awak tekanlah peratus apa kali 100 maknanya awak ada 70 % rujukan terkini. Maknanya, tesis ini boleh diterima. Bermakna boleh diterima. Kalau misalannya ialah maklumat kita ni sebenarya nak mengelat daripada pelajar plagiat. Ada tiru bulat-bulat ataupun pelajar tu memang malas kesimpulannya. Nak baca pun tak nak, nak rujuk yang terkini lagi tak nak. Lepastu bila kita tanya kenapa tidak ada rujukan terkini. “Oh tidak ada kajian Prof. Saya cari-cari tak jumpa.” Yang dicari tu ada 3 sahaja artikel yang dicari. Yang lagi 546 artikel tajuk sama dia tak cari. Jadi dia kata saya dah cari tapi tak jumpa. Aduhai, jadi ayat tu kita tak mahu terima. Jadi semua tak terima, bukan saya tak terima semua penyelia pun tak terima. Jadi, pastikan awak cari tepat dapat 70% memang boleh terima. Boleh duduk goyang kaki pergi jalan-jalan. Pergi IOI makan banyak-banyak, sebab boleh kita meraikan bahawa rujukan-rujukan 70% sudah tercapai. Haa begitu, jadi pastikan 70% janganlah sampai awak dapat “Alamak prof 20% je Prof. Saya dah usaha 3 tahun, saya usaha nak cari rujukan yang terkini tak jumpa. Saya dapat semua kebanyakan 1980 an.” Lepastu dapatlah 2010 kebawah. Memang saya kata silalah buat universiti sendiri, sebab dia tak usaha lansung. Jadi pastikan 70% daripada rujukan terkini. Tengoklah bila tarikh yang awak nak hantar. Buat rujukan itu. Jangan ada satu lagi ya contohnya, kalau awak nak hantar tadi 2023. Okay, dia nak hantar 2023 tu pada bulan Disember. Okaylah kita ambil Oktober. Oktober dia nak hantar 2023. Tetapi didapati bahawa yang rujukan 2023 tiada. Lansung tiada dalam tesis tersebut. Sedangkan masa yang dia nak submit ialah Oktober. Maknanya, artikel untuk 2023 dah keluar banyak dah. Tapi bila kita semak tak ada rujukan 2023. 2022 lagilah tak ada. Yang dia banyak yang ini 2021. Tak boleh, kita kena la ada terutama yang ini. Yang memang terkini masa hantar tesis memang terbaiklah. Jadi ini penting. Jangan yang ini sahaja kita fokus. Jadi pastikan ada pada tarikh awak hantar tahun itu punya rujukan mesti ada. Okay, penting bagi ini penting, rujukan ini semua penting, cara-cara nak rujuk semua ada dekat dalam ni. Ada pelbagai cara buat rujukan. Bibliografi dan rujukan bagaimana kita nak tulis semua cara dia berbeza. Tapi kalau nama Melayu dalam jurnal melayu memang tulis nama penuh ya. Normaliza Abd Rahim contoh dia. Tetapi kadang-kadang saya hantar artikel ke jurnal antarabangsa contohnya, saya dah tulis dalam artikel tu Normaliza Abd Rahim. Bibliografi pun Normaliza Abd Rahim tetapi dia formatkan semua jadi nama saya jadi begini. Dia yang automatik buat. Saya tak buat sebab saya percaya kalau yang ini ada berjuta-juta orang nama Rahim N.A terutamanya Rahim ini memang ramailah. Jadi sebab itu  lah saya ambil Normaliza Abd Rahim. Tapi terpaksa ikut cara jurnal itu sebab jurnal antarabangsa memang dia ada format dia sendiri. Kadang-kadang saya submit dia hantar balik katakan mohon untuk tukar cara penulisan. Sebab kena ikut cara dia. Ni kalau barat memang nama akhirlah. Sebab itu kena ikut semua cara barat. Terpulang kepada apa yang terkeluar. Nanti jurnal saya jelaskan dalam video yang lain. Jadi jurnal saya tentang penulisan bibliografi ini sangat penting. 70%. Kalau tak cukup cari lagi. Janagan hantar tesis selagi tak cukup sebab ini menunjukkan kualiti tesis tersebut. Kalau misalnya awak dapat 60% tu memang tak boleh la nak diterima sebab macam taknak usaha. Sebenar boleh je cari. Banyak sahaja artikel yang awak boleh sorot.

 

TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS:

Bibliography #Lets Write a Thesis

Bibliography. This bibliography is important, indeed everything is important. All writings in the thesis are important. All writing is important. Bibliography is also important. So when we want to do a bibliography, we have to be consistent, we either do the APA or MLA style. But usually his students like that APA he says is easy, but when we look at it make a mistake too. So, this bibliography, if we look at it is normal. If you look in this book, I have an example of how to write a reference in the form of APA. Because if I put it in two, it's usually if the thesis is WHAT. So make sure that if the journal. The name of the italic journal. So if we look at the examples found in this, blink yes, okay. We are all at once. How do we want, close to bibliography and references. Examples Malays how we want to refer. For example, for example bibliography and reference of Siti Nur Aliaa Roslan. The length, for example the name of Malay name usually are so long. Yeah it's known, nowadays there are three words Malay name. There are up to four words. There are up to five teachers who want to write in school later. That is why the name for example, the name of Alim Al Mustakim Billah finally his mother, went to make a stamp so the book is all he stamps. No need to write by hand. So the name of Malay park full name. And the bible is full in the reference is full. In this thesis in the bibliography so. So everything is named like this. If Cin Li Li's name, for example, is Cin or not a bibliography, Cin.L.L is in the bibliography. Name Arumugammutusami how. Japanese name how, and so on. There are examples so if for example we see in this book. If the reference in the thesis we put if this Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) in parentheses. Then there is, so if there are brackets all place brackets all there is no coma. So this is point two if there is a page and so on. We have many examples of us yes.So he, the bibliography should contain the following information. So here is all his information. So writing a reference in a thesis how. These are all instructions. So there are ways of writing all there in this so as not to be confused. What I want to explain here is to make sure that his writing must be correct in the bibliography. And also importantly, this is in this thesis bibliography. What you refer to in the thesis should be in the bibliography. Then check. I like to check manually. Meaning, I print the bibliography on the side, the laptop is here, look at the pages one by one. If the tag we put is red near the laptop, our bibliography is right. Then this is right. Because if you make a manual, it is correct. We do not want to believe very close to this machine, not disbelieve. I really do not believe. Machine name is also a machine. So in the thesis there is that reference in the bibliography there is that reference. This is before I want to submit this thesis. Then we check in the bibliography there is a tick that name should be in the thesis there is also. Meaning, we have to cross refferency. Meaning both are definitely there. What is not there, throw it away. Do not aspire to have a bibliography of up to 10-15 pages when it is not even in the thesis. Indeed we check we check one by one. That is why it is the duty of the examiner. That is my job. I read in my thesis open I look behind me right. I read for example, in this his name is Muhammad Mustakim Roslan 2019 suddenly near the back of Muhammad Mustakim Roslan 2018 pulak. It's different as if there are two different articles. So wrong, like for example the bibliography there is Amal Mustakim Roslam 2019 look closely in Amal Mustakim Roslan 2015 is not appropriate. Both are wrong. So be sure to check one by one. Okay for the thesis. Indeed, for thesis and also for articles like that. We need 70% up-to-date references. The latest meaning is like I said must be a reference 5 years ago. So that is what you make sure if you submit your thesis in 2023. Meaning, 5 years back in 2019. 5 years ago. Okay 70% of what you mean is the sum of everything first. All in the bibliography then the number of examples, the number is 100 all at once in his thesis. Then I calculated that 5 years ago. 5 years ago I guess there are 70. 70 yes. So you press you have a calculator near your phone that is more expensive than me. So you press the calculator so you press the percentage what 100 times means you have 70% of the latest references. Meaning, this thesis is acceptable. Means acceptable. If, for example, our information actually wants to stick to plagiarism students. There is a complete imitation or the student is really lazy in conclusion. I don't even want to read, I want to refer to the latest, I don't want to. Then when we ask why there is no latest reference. "Oh, there is no study by Prof. I was looking for it but did not find it. ” There are only 3 articles that are searched. The other 546 articles of the same title he did not look for. So he said I searched but did not find it. Alas, so that sentence we do not want to accept. So all do not accept, not I do not accept all supervisors do not accept. So, make sure you find exactly 70% can be acceptable. Can sit rocking legs go for a walk. Go IOI eat a lot, cause we can celebrate that 70% references have been reached. So make sure you got 70% do not be like "Oh My Goodness Prof  I only got 20% Prof. I have been trying for 3 years, I tried to find the latest reference but could not find it. I got it all most of the 1980s. ” Then get 2010 down. Indeed, I said please make your own university, because he did not make any effort. So make sure 70% of the latest references. See when the date you want to send. Make that reference. Don't have another one, for example, if you want to send 2023. Okay, he wants to send 2023 in December. Okay let's take October. October he wants to send 2023. But it is found that the reference 2023 is not there. Directly not in the thesis. While the time he wants to submit is October. Meaning, articles for 2023 have come out a lot. But if we check there is no reference 2023.

2022 again no more. That he has a lot of this 2021. No way, we have to have it especially this one. The latest time to submit a thesis is the best. So this is important. Let's not focus on this alone. So make sure that on the date you send that year there must be a reference. Okay, this is important, this reference is all important, the ways to refer to it are all close in here. There are various ways to make a reference. Bibliography and references on how we want to write all the ways he is different. But if the name of the Malays in the journal yes indeed write the full name. Normaliza Abd Rahim is an example of him. But sometimes I send articles to international journals for example, I have written in that article Normaliza Abd Rahim. Bibliography is also Normaliza Abd Rahim but she formatted everything so my name is like this. He automatically does. I do not do it because I believe that this one has millions of people named Rahim N.A especially Rahim is indeed crowded. So that is why I took Normaliza Abd Rahim. But he had to follow the way of the journal because the international journal did have its own format. Sometimes I submit he sends back say please to change the way of writing. Because you have to follow his way. If the west is the last name. That is why we have to follow all the western ways. Depends on what comes out. Later my journal will explain in another video. So my journal about writing this bibliography is very important. 70%. If not enough search again. Do not submits a thesis as long as it is not enough because this shows the quality of the thesis. If, for example, you get 60%, it really can't be accepted because it looks like you don't want to try. You can actually search. There are so many articles you can highlight.

Rujukan :

    Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2019).  Jom Tulis Tesis. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Kehadiran Minggu 11